IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Alex Huang Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2007-07-30 Country: Canada
2025 · Round 4, Pick #122  ·  Nashville Predators Nashville Predators
Harvard
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Chicoutimi Saguenéens QMJHL 61 8 28 36 0.590 0.2900 0.3234 1.5760 1.7576
2024-25 Chicoutimi Saguenéens QMJHL 64 7 33 40 0.625 0.3071 0.3274 1.6689 1.7791
2025-26 Chicoutimi Saguenéens QMJHL 62 11 59 70 1.129 0.5547 0.5651 3.0148 3.0715
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Age-Out / Club
92%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#1706
Defenseman overall
#175
Defenseman born in 2007
#320
in QMJHL

D1 Comparables

Ian McCoshen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.83 PPG
→ Boston College (0.37 D1 FR PPG)
0.52 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

Harvard Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Adam Fox
USHL 2015-16
1.14
actual FR PPG at Harvard
Henry Thrun
USHL 2018-19
0.68
actual FR PPG at Harvard

D2/3 Comparables

Ryan Ellis
SUNY Oswego · 2002-03
1.704 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Brandon Osmundson
Utica · 2016-17
1.448 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Gus Katsuras
Hamilton · 2001-02
1.400 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.