← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jan Golicic Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2006-06-30 Country: Slovenia
2024 · Round 4, Pick #118  ·  Tampa Bay Lightning Tampa Bay Lightning
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
Quinnipiac
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Gatineau Olympiques QMJHL 65 3 26 29 0.446 0.2192 0.2326 1.1915 1.2644
2024-25 Gatineau Olympiques QMJHL 58 4 31 35 0.603 0.2965 0.3001 1.6113 1.6306
2025-26 Blainville-Boisbriand Armada QMJHL 57 5 39 44 0.772 0.3792 0.3658 2.0612 1.9885
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
12%
Age-Out / Club
72%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#2923
Defenseman overall
#579
Defenseman born in 2006
#513
in QMJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.44 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

Quinnipiac Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

QMJHL 2023-24
0.09
actual FR PPG at Quinnipiac
BCHL 2014-15
0.46
actual FR PPG at Quinnipiac
OJHL 2017-18
0.00
actual FR PPG at Quinnipiac
USHL 2022-23
0.00
actual FR PPG at Quinnipiac

D2/3 Comparables

University of New England · 2017-18
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Worcester State · 2023-24
0.769 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Neumann · 2002-03
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.