IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Maddox Labre Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2007-06-15 Country: Canada
Ohio State
BigTen D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Victoriaville Tigres QMJHL 4 0 1 1 0.250 0.1228 0.1362 0.6676 0.7404
2024-25 Victoriaville Tigres QMJHL 61 3 16 19 0.311 0.1530 0.1622 0.8318 0.8816
2025-26 Victoriaville Tigres QMJHL 59 1 19 20 0.339 0.1666 0.1687 0.9052 0.9166
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

48%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
12%
Age-Out / Club
38%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#9776
Defenseman overall
#1338
Defenseman born in 2007
#1040
in QMJHL

D1 Comparables

Chris Leibinger
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Doyle Somerby
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Boston University (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Cutler Martin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Michigan (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Jimmy Mazza
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Canisius (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Scott Moldenhauer
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

Ohio State Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

C.J. Regula
NAHL 2016-17
0.13
actual FR PPG at Ohio State
Cole McWard
USHL 2019-20
0.44
actual FR PPG at Ohio State
Josh Healey
AJHL 2012-13
0.15
actual FR PPG at Ohio State
Chris Romaine
NE-Prep 2021-22
0.00
actual FR PPG at Ohio State

D2/3 Comparables

Devin Niles
Fitchburg State · 2024-25
1.500 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Conor Brown
Amherst · 2010-11
0.857 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Blake Norris
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2020-21
0.409 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.