← New Search ↗ Social Card

Maddox Labre Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2007-06-15 Country: Canada
Ohio State
BigTen D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Victoriaville Tigres QMJHL 4 0 1 1 0.250 0.1228 0.1362 0.6674 0.7402
2024-25 Victoriaville Tigres QMJHL 61 3 16 19 0.311 0.1530 0.1622 0.8316 0.8814
2025-26 Victoriaville Tigres QMJHL 59 1 19 20 0.339 0.1666 0.1687 0.9050 0.9164
2026-27 Québec Remparts QMJHL 6 0 3 3 0.500 0.2457 0.2457 1.3348 1.3348
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

48%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
10%
Age-Out / Club
35%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#9924
Defenseman overall
#1397
Defenseman born in 2007
#1057
in QMJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.44 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Average D
NCAAe PPG

Ohio State Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

NE-Prep 2021-22
0.00
actual FR PPG at Ohio State
USHL 2024-25
0.27
actual FR PPG at Ohio State
NAHL 2017-18
0.13
actual FR PPG at Ohio State
USHL 2018-19
0.08
actual FR PPG at Ohio State

D2/3 Comparables

UMass Dartmouth · 2018-19
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Hamilton · 2011-12
1.091 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Roger Williams · 2024-25
0.778 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.