← New Search ↗ Social Card

C.J. Regula Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1998-05-29 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Wichita Falls Wildcats NAHL 52 7 13 20 0.385 0.1413 0.1468 0.4059 0.4216
2017-18 NAHL 57 9 12 21 0.368 0.1354 0.1339 0.3888 0.3846
2018-19 NAHL 50 10 28 38 0.760 0.2792 0.2637 1.5017 1.3613
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 RPI D1 ECAC 29 2 5 7 0.241
2022-23 Ohio State D1 BigTen 35 0 2 2 0.057
2021-22 Ohio State D1 BigTen 7 0 1 1 0.143
2020-21 Ohio State D1 BigTen 23 2 4 6 0.261
2019-20 Ohio State D1 BigTen 23 0 3 3 0.130
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.13
2019-20 · Ohio State
-34.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

48%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
35%
Age-Out / Club
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5738
Defenseman overall
#1234
Defenseman born in 1998

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Westfield State · 2007-08
1.208 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Morrisville · 2014-15
1.083 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Geneseo · 2002-03
1.077 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.