| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-17 | Wichita Falls Wildcats | NAHL | 52 | 7 | 13 | 20 | 0.385 | 0.1413 | 0.1468 | 0.4059 | 0.4216 |
| 2017-18 | — | NAHL | 57 | 9 | 12 | 21 | 0.368 | 0.1354 | 0.1339 | 0.3888 | 0.3846 |
| 2018-19 | — | NAHL | 50 | 10 | 28 | 38 | 0.760 | 0.2792 | 0.2637 | 1.5017 | 1.3613 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-24 | RPI | D1 | ECAC | — | 29 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 0.241 |
| 2022-23 | Ohio State | D1 | BigTen | — | 35 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.057 |
| 2021-22 | Ohio State | D1 | BigTen | — | 7 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.143 |
| 2020-21 | Ohio State | D1 | BigTen | — | 23 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 0.261 |
| 2019-20 | Ohio State | D1 | BigTen | — | 23 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.130 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.