IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Andrew Brown Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-07-01 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Oakville Blades OJHL 49 3 14 17 0.347 0.0850 0.0957 0.2388 0.2689
2022-23 Oakville Blades OJHL 52 9 27 36 0.692 0.1697 0.1824 0.4766 0.5122
2023-24 Nanaimo Clippers BCHL 47 7 22 29 0.617 0.2377 0.2460 0.8979 0.9291
2024-25 Cape Breton Eagles QMJHL 33 4 10 14 0.424 0.2084 0.2005 1.1327 1.0898
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 St. Lawrence D1 ECAC — 34 0 8 8 0.235
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.21
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.24
2025-26 · St. Lawrence
+13.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

42%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
20%
Age-Out / Club
25%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4752
Defenseman overall
#1224
Defenseman born in 2005

D1 Comparables

Tucker Poolman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.44 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
James Roll
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Niklas Nevalainen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Christopher Dienes
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Mike McKee
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Taylor McCloy
Adrian · 2012-13
1.500 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Swain
Neumann · 2014-15
0.905 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Joe Anderson
Wisconsin-Stout · 2013-14
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.