← New Search ↗ Social Card

Enzo Lottin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2008-02-11 Country: Canada
Nebraska Omaha
NCHC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Victoriaville Tigres QMJHL 43 6 6 12 0.279 0.1371 0.1498 0.7453 0.8145
2025-26 Victoriaville Tigres QMJHL 49 17 25 42 0.857 0.4211 0.4403 2.2887 2.3932
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
12%
Age-Out / Club
72%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#16485
Forward overall
#221
Forward born in 2008
#560
in QMJHL

D1 Comparables

NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Yale (0.48 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Michigan (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.62 PPG
→ Michigan (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.38 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.43 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.92 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.56 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Nebraska Omaha Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

SHL 2025-26
0.59
actual FR PPG at Nebraska Omaha
USHL 2019-20
0.62
actual FR PPG at Nebraska Omaha
NTDP-U18 2017-18
0.44
actual FR PPG at Nebraska Omaha
QMJHL 2021-22
0.58
actual FR PPG at Nebraska Omaha

D2/3 Comparables

Southern New Hampshire · 2016-17
0.593 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Elmira · 2014-15
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Curry · 2006-07
1.769 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.