← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cameron Berg Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-01-29 Country: USA
2021 NHL Draft Round 4, Pick #125  ·  New York Islanders New York Islanders
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Omaha Lancers USHL 51 3 7 10 0.196 0.1205 0.1313 0.5777 0.6297
2019-20 USHL 46 20 14 34 0.739 0.4543 0.4543 2.1775 2.1775
2020-21 Muskegon Lumberjacks USHL 51 27 31 58 1.137 0.6991 0.6991 3.3507 3.3507
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 North Dakota D1 NCHC 26 12 10 22 0.846
2023-24 North Dakota D1 NCHC 40 20 17 37 0.925
2022-23 Nebraska Omaha D1 NCHC 37 10 14 24 0.649
2021-22 Nebraska Omaha D1 NCHC 37 8 15 23 0.622
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.62
2021-22 · Nebraska Omaha
+453.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
75%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5713
Forward overall
#251
Forward born in 2002
#363
in USHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Cornell (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Michigan State
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Boston College (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Yale (0.88 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Penn State (0.57 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Neumann · 2003-04
1.067 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Middlebury · 2000-01
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Adrian · 2017-18
0.643 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.