IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Rafael Cloutier Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-08-22 Country: Canada
Clarkson
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Blainville-Boisbriand Armada QMJHL 29 3 8 11 0.379 0.1864 0.1993 1.0128 1.0829
2025-26 Blainville-Boisbriand Armada QMJHL 62 10 17 27 0.435 0.2140 0.2187 1.1629 1.1884
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

45%
NCAA D1
20%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Age-Out / Club
30%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#28027
Forward overall
#944
Forward born in 2007
#836
in QMJHL

D1 Comparables

Zach Aston-Reese
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.54 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Average
NCAAe PPG
Thomas Ebbing
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Kyle Osterberg
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.77 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Nate Arentz
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Max Shuart
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Michigan
0.25 No data
NCAAe PPG

Clarkson Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Charlie Russell
AJHL 2021-22
0.00
actual FR PPG at Clarkson
Owen Van Steensel
OHL 2022-23
0.66
actual FR PPG at Clarkson
Jared Mangan
NE-Prep 2020-21
0.29
actual FR PPG at Clarkson
Luke Pakulak
BCHL 2021-22
0.23
actual FR PPG at Clarkson

D2/3 Comparables

Taylor McCloy
Adrian · 2011-12
1.500 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Dustin Norman
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2002-03
0.850 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Craig Levey
Hobart · 2000-01
1.038 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.