IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Anthony Dontigny Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2008-03-25 Country: Canada
Cornell
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Shawinigan Cataractes QMJHL 6 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2025-26 Rimouski Océanic QMJHL 26 1 5 6 0.231 0.1134 0.1192 0.6163 0.6480
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
30%
Age-Out / Club
57%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#52506
Forward overall
#1126
Forward born in 2008
#1726
in QMJHL

D1 Comparables

Riley Alferd
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Kiefer Sherwood
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Miami (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Average
NCAAe PPG
John Wiitala
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Adam Winborg
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Michigan (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG
Drew Callin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Bentley (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Cornell Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Sean Donaldson
BCHL 2018-19
0.45
actual FR PPG at Cornell
Kyle Penney
NE-Prep 2018-19
0.44
actual FR PPG at Cornell
Sullivan Mack
NE-Prep 2018-19
0.10
actual FR PPG at Cornell
Ryan Walsh
NE-Prep 2021-22
1.00
actual FR PPG at Cornell

D2/3 Comparables

Jackson Bond
Hamline · 2013-14
0.958 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Rob Sgarbossa
SUNY Morrisville · 2003-04
0.880 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan McDonald
Framingham State · 2005-06
0.818 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.