← New Search ↗ Social Card

Justin Beaulieu Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2009-07-15 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2025-26 Rimouski Océanic QMJHL 62 3 8 11 0.177 0.0872 0.0974 0.4736 0.5289
2026-27 Rimouski Océanic QMJHL 7 1 5 6 0.857 0.4211 0.4211 2.2881 2.2881
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
8%
Age-Out / Club
70%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#19452
Defenseman overall
#320
Defenseman born in 2009
#1601
in QMJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.83 PPG
→ Boston College (0.37 D1 FR PPG)
0.52 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.54 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Cornell
0.41 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.37 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Elmira · 2016-17
1.067 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Wilkes · 2016-17
1.385 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Hobart · 2016-17
1.231 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.