IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Louis-Émile Dumais Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2009-05-19 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2025-26 Shawinigan Cataractes QMJHL 9 5 5 10 1.111 0.5459 0.6054 2.9662 3.2895
2026-27 Shawinigan Cataractes QMJHL 6 0 1 1 0.167 0.0819 0.0819 0.4450 0.4450
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
12%
Age-Out / Club
72%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

D1 Comparables

Matt Mendelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Penn State (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Nick Hutchison
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Canisius (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Zach Evancho
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Army (0.62 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Max Humitz
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.07 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Adam Winborg
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Michigan (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jordan Watts
Adrian · 2006-07
0.852 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Luc Malkhassian
Middlebury · 2022-23
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Emmond Bell
Norwich · 2004-05
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.