← New Search ↗ Social Card

Max Humitz Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-07-08 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Lincoln Stars USHL 18 0 2 2 0.111 0.0683 0.0722 0.3273 0.3458
2013-14 Lincoln Stars USHL 58 10 19 29 0.500 0.3074 0.3104 1.4731 1.4875
2014-15 USHL 57 8 15 23 0.404 0.2480 0.2382 1.1888 1.1420
2015-16 USHL 54 11 8 19 0.352 0.2163 0.1977 1.0368 0.9478
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Lake Superior State D1 WCHA SR 41 22 13 35 0.854
2018-19 Lake Superior State D1 WCHA JR 36 16 17 33 0.917
2017-18 Lake Superior State D1 WCHA SO 36 13 10 23 0.639
2016-17 Lake Superior State D1 WCHA FR 36 13 7 20 0.556
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.56
2016-17 · Lake Superior State
+203.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#21525
Forward overall
#810
Forward born in 1995
#2143
in USHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Marian · 2008-09
1.148 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2014-15
0.905 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Superior · 2013-14
0.518 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.