← New Search ↗ Social Card

Max Humitz Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-07-08 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Lincoln Stars USHL 18 0 2 2 0.111 0.0655 0.0692 0.3337 0.3526
2013-14 Lincoln Stars USHL 58 10 19 29 0.500 0.2949 0.2978 1.5017 1.5164
2014-15 USHL 57 8 15 23 0.404 0.2380 0.2286 1.2119 1.1642
2015-16 USHL 54 11 8 19 0.352 0.2076 0.1898 1.0569 0.9662
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Lake Superior State D1 WCHA SR 41 22 13 35 0.854
2018-19 Lake Superior State D1 WCHA JR 36 16 17 33 0.917
2017-18 Lake Superior State D1 WCHA SO 36 13 10 23 0.639
2016-17 Lake Superior State D1 WCHA FR 36 13 7 20 0.556
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.56
2016-17 · Lake Superior State
+216.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#21816
Forward overall
#813
Forward born in 1995
#2130
in USHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Neumann · 2023-24
1.042 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Fredonia · 2018-19
0.818 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2010-11
1.038 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.