IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Grady Schaefer Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2009-01-23 Country: USA
Bowling Green
CCHA D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Anaheim Jr. Ducks 13U AAA 13u-aaa 44 26 38 64 1.454 — — — —
2024-25 Honeybaked 15U AAA 15u-aaa 69 26 33 59 0.855 — — — —
2025-26 Oakland Jr. Grizzlies 16U AAA maha-16u 21 17 16 33 1.571 — — — —
2026-27 Powell River Kings BCHL 7 2 1 3 0.429 0.1651 0.1651 0.6234 0.6234
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
12%
Age-Out / Club
50%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

D1 Comparables

Ryan Siroky
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Miami (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Joe Widmar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ UMass (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jake Evans
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Kyle Eastman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.19 PPG
→ Robert Morris (0.09 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Andrew Oglevie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Bowling Green Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Brett Pfoh
BCHL 2019-20
0.21
actual FR PPG at Bowling Green
Adam Zlnka
USHL 2021-22
0.19
actual FR PPG at Bowling Green
Seth Fyten
AJHL 2018-19
0.21
actual FR PPG at Bowling Green
Jake Sloan
WHL 2021-22
0.22
actual FR PPG at Bowling Green

D2/3 Comparables

Tyler Miller
St. Scholastica · 2006-07
0.852 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Marlon Gardner
Neumann · 2004-05
1.067 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt Weber
Aurora · 2017-18
0.821 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.