← New Search ↗ Social Card

Seth Fyten Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-11-23 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Spruce Grove Saints AJHL 48 9 9 18 0.375 0.1258 0.1376 0.3469 0.3794
2018-19 Spruce Grove Saints AJHL 53 18 10 28 0.528 0.1772 0.1852 0.4888 0.5109
2019-20 Spruce Grove Saints AJHL 55 20 23 43 0.782 0.2622 0.2622 0.7233 0.7233
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Bowling Green D1 CCHA GR 30 1 4 5 0.167
2023-24 Bowling Green D1 CCHA SR 26 7 6 13 0.500
2022-23 Bowling Green D1 CCHA JR 7 2 0 2 0.286
2021-22 Bowling Green D1 CCHA SO 35 2 1 3 0.086
2020-21 Bowling Green D1 WCHA FR 28 5 1 6 0.214
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.21
2020-21 · Bowling Green
+50.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
75%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#28601
Forward overall
#1411
Forward born in 2000
#847
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Boston College (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Army (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Harvard (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.19 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2010-11
0.583 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Curry · 2011-12
0.727 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Neumann · 2010-11
0.609 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.