← New Search ↗ Social Card

Colin Grubb Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2009-04-02 Country: USA
North Dakota
NCHC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 MN North Dakota 14U AAA mnbel-14u 11 10 10 20 1.818 — — — —
2024-25 Shattuck St. Mary's 16U AAA 16u-aaa 54 16 40 56 1.037 — — — —
2025-26 Shattuck St. Mary's 18U Prep ushs-prep 51 13 27 40 0.784 — — — —
2026-27 Brandon Wheat Kings WHL 7 3 2 5 0.714 0.3475 0.3475 1.7448 1.7448
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
18%
Age-Out / Club
52%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Penn State (0.76 D1 FR PPG)
0.38 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Michigan (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.49 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.66 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Strong
NCAAe PPG

North Dakota Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHS-MN 2024-25
0.00
actual FR PPG at North Dakota
USHS-MN 2020-21
1.08
actual FR PPG at North Dakota
NTDP-U18 2018-19
0.41
actual FR PPG at North Dakota
NTDP-U18 2017-18
0.29
actual FR PPG at North Dakota

D2/3 Comparables

University of New England · 2010-11
1.654 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Curry · 2018-19
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Lake Forest · 2021-22
0.963 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.