IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Declan Wotton Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2009-05-16 Country: USA
Cornell
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2025-26 Baie-Comeau Drakkar QMJHL 28 4 2 6 0.214 0.1053 0.1167 0.5722 0.6343
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
18%
Age-Out / Club
68%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#45760
Forward overall
#234
Forward born in 2009
#1397
in QMJHL

D1 Comparables

Sam Kauppila
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.09 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Alex Tuch
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Boston College (0.76 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Chris Dodero
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ American International (0.09 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
J.J. Piccinich
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Boston University (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Joe Wegwerth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Cornell Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Kyle Penney
NE-Prep 2018-19
0.44
actual FR PPG at Cornell
Sullivan Mack
NE-Prep 2018-19
0.10
actual FR PPG at Cornell
Ryan Walsh
NE-Prep 2021-22
1.00
actual FR PPG at Cornell
Nick DeSantis
USHL 2018-19
0.67
actual FR PPG at Cornell

D2/3 Comparables

Marlon Gardner
Neumann · 2003-04
1.067 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Mickey Gilchrist
Middlebury · 2000-01
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Scott
Williams · 2014-15
0.538 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.