IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Bastien Michaud Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2009-05-02 Country: Canada
New Hampshire
HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2025-26 Québec Remparts QMJHL 5 0 1 1 0.200 0.0983 0.1088 0.5341 0.5911
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
30%
Age-Out / Club
57%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

D1 Comparables

Ryan Collins
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Jack Glover
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Nathan Billitier
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
Louie Belpedio
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Miami (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.07 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
John MacLeod
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Boston University (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG

New Hampshire Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Ryan Philbrick
NE-Prep 2021-22
0.23
actual FR PPG at New Hampshire
Damien Carfagna
NE-Prep 2019-20
0.46
actual FR PPG at New Hampshire
Max Gildon
USHL 2015-16
0.64
actual FR PPG at New Hampshire
Zach Hahn
NE-Prep 2019-20
0.00
actual FR PPG at New Hampshire

D2/3 Comparables

Chris Atkinson
Curry · 2004-05
0.962 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Peter Magagna
SUNY Oswego · 2000-01
0.926 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Michael Hawkrigg
Trinity · 2008-09
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.