IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jason Weeks Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1985-03-26 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2003-04 Cleveland Barons NAHL 50 21 32 53 1.060 0.4200 0.4280 1.1129 1.1341
2004-05 — NAHL 47 19 24 43 0.915 0.3625 0.3514 0.9606 0.9311
2005-06 Texarkana Bandits NAHL 57 30 25 55 0.965 0.3823 0.3516 1.0130 0.9317
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2009-10 Canisius D1 AHA SR 34 9 13 22 0.647
2008-09 Canisius D1 AHA JR 36 14 25 39 1.083
2007-08 Canisius D1 AHA SO 33 12 8 20 0.606
2006-07 Canisius D1 AHA FR 35 15 11 26 0.743
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.30
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.74
2006-07 · Canisius
+146.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#9564
Forward overall
#299
Forward born in 1985
#229
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Carlos Amestoy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Walchuk
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
Todd Skirving
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ RIT (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Kevin Valenti
Utica · 2013-14
0.538 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Hunter Schneider
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2015-16
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Ross Enmark
Curry · 2005-06
1.308 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.