IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jimmy Mullin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1992-02-24 Country: USA
2010 · Round 4, Pick #118  ·  Tampa Bay Lightning Tampa Bay Lightning
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Fargo Force USHL 52 23 37 60 1.154 0.6806 0.6725 3.4653 3.4240
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 Minnesota State D1 WCHA SR 31 2 8 10 0.323
2014-15 Miami D1 NCHC — 0 0 0 0 0.000
2013-14 Miami D1 NCHC JR 19 1 6 7 0.368
2012-13 Miami D1 CCHA-orig SO 38 6 8 14 0.368
2011-12 Miami D1 CCHA-orig FR 37 11 15 26 0.703
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.63
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.70
2011-12 · Miami
+12.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#2961
Forward overall
#164
Forward born in 1992
#58
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Peter Quenneville
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.11 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.80 D1 FR PPG)
0.65 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Toninato
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.09 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.43 D1 FR PPG)
0.64 Average
NCAAe PPG
Dennis Kravchenko
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.11 PPG
→ UMass (0.92 D1 FR PPG)
0.65 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Frank Vatrano
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ UMass
0.58 No data
NCAAe PPG
Vinnie Hinostroza
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.30 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.94 D1 FR PPG)
0.76 Elite
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Arkhip Ledenkov
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Neil Trimm
Neumann · 2003-04
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Filimon Ledenkov
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.