IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jim Pentecost Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1985-05-04 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2003-04 Soo Indians NAHL 51 11 13 24 0.471 0.1865 0.1911 0.4941 0.5062
2004-05 Soo Indians NAHL 56 20 17 37 0.661 0.2618 0.2552 0.6937 0.6761
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2008-09 Curry D3 — SR 10 5 5 10 1.000
2007-08 Curry D3 — JR 26 11 8 19 0.731
2006-07 Curry D3 — SO 24 9 11 20 0.833
2005-06 Curry D3 — FR 27 9 12 21 0.778
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.78
2005-06 · Curry
+295.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#23649
Forward overall
#743
Forward born in 1985
#1814
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Tommy Schutt
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tanner Pond
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Evan Janssen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Denver (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Gage Hough
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Alfred Larsson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Austin Marini
Southern Maine · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Kyle Gattelaro
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2012-13
0.893 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jackson Leef
Westfield State · 2011-12
0.926 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.