IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jack Wolgemuth Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1984-09-07 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2003-04 Wichita Falls Wildcats NAHL 44 3 11 14 0.318 0.1169 0.1159 0.3359 0.3331
2004-05 Wichita Falls Wildcats NAHL 56 0 25 25 0.446 0.1640 0.1545 0.4712 0.4438
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2008-09 Wisconsin-Stout D3 WIAC SR 28 4 13 17 0.607
2007-08 Wisconsin-Stout D3 WIAC JR 30 7 23 30 1.000
2006-07 Wisconsin-Stout D3 WIAC SO 25 2 10 12 0.480
2005-06 Wisconsin-Stout D3 WIAC FR 28 3 4 7 0.250
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.25
2005-06 · Wisconsin-Stout
+90.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#9992
Defenseman overall
#1014
Defenseman born in 1984
#3533
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Benjamin Gallacher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Nolan Valleau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Isaac Baker
Concordia · 2023-24
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Cory Harder
St. Norbert · 2006-07
0.438 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Mitchell Dolter
St. Olaf · 2017-18
0.292 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.