IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mike MacMillan Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1984-05-11 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2003-04 Billings Bulls NAHL 40 4 8 12 0.300 0.1066 0.1040 0.3164 0.3086
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2007-08 St. Olaf D3 MIAC SR 25 4 9 13 0.520
2006-07 St. Olaf D3 MIAC JR 24 2 7 9 0.375
2005-06 St. Olaf D3 MIAC SO 26 2 10 12 0.462
2004-05 St. Olaf D3 MIAC FR 27 8 17 25 0.926
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.93
2004-05 · St. Olaf
+940.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#42852
Forward overall
#1225
Forward born in 1984
#4622
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Matthew Hansen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
William Messa
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Spezia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ben Greiner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Andrew Mather
SUNY Oswego · 2006-07
0.308 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Brendan Westbrook
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Aaron O'Neill
Lake Forest · 2016-17
0.630 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.