IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mitch Sabo Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1984-08-10 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2003-04 — NAHL 44 3 9 12 0.273 0.0969 0.0957 0.2863 0.2828
2004-05 Toledo IceDiggers NAHL 54 0 9 9 0.167 0.0592 0.0555 0.1750 0.1642
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2008-09 Suffolk D3 — SR 25 10 9 19 0.760
2007-08 Suffolk D3 — JR 27 2 9 11 0.407
2006-07 Suffolk D3 — SO 24 6 9 15 0.625
2005-06 Lawrence D3 ECAC FR 19 7 3 10 0.526
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.53
2005-06 · Lawrence
+678.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#19743
Defenseman overall
#1387
Defenseman born in 1984
#5746
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Connor Williams
Arcadia · 2021-22
0.385 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Emerson Mish
SUNY Cortland · 2002-03
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Jordan Skinner
Southern Maine · 2005-06
0.280 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.