IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Eric Curtis Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1985-03-01 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2003-04 Soo Indians NAHL 28 2 10 12 0.429 0.1698 0.1725 0.4500 0.4570
2004-05 — NAHL 15 2 4 6 0.400 0.1585 0.1531 0.4200 0.4056
2005-06 — NAHL 5 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2009-10 Castleton D3 — SR 22 3 5 8 0.364
2008-09 Castleton D3 — JR 23 4 5 9 0.391
2007-08 Castleton D3 — SO 20 3 3 6 0.300
2006-07 Castleton D3 — FR 21 8 7 15 0.714
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.71
2006-07 · Castleton
+418.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#34371
Forward overall
#1057
Forward born in 1985
#3404
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
Gage Hough
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

John Grealish
UMass Dartmouth · 2017-18
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Glenn Wiswell
Castleton · 2015-16
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Ross Andersen
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2010-11
0.708 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.