IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Steve Murphy Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1985-03-11 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2003-04 — NAHL 24 4 5 9 0.375 0.1378 0.1401 0.3958 0.4025
2004-05 — NAHL 34 6 3 9 0.265 0.0973 0.0941 0.2794 0.2702
2005-06 Wasilla Spirit NAHL 57 14 9 23 0.404 0.1482 0.1360 0.4259 0.3908
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2009-10 St. Thomas D3 CCHA SR 9 4 3 7 0.778
2008-09 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC JR 24 11 7 18 0.750
2007-08 Curry D3 CNE SO 24 2 6 8 0.333
2006-07 Curry D3 CNE FR 22 5 5 10 0.455
2006-07 Franklin Pierce D2 NE10 FR 19 0 4 4 0.210
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.45
2006-07 · Curry
+345.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#38278
Forward overall
#1207
Forward born in 1985
#4004
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Tyler Romasco
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2007-08
0.571 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Trey Gardner
Wisconsin-Stout · 2014-15
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Eli Lynn
Becker · 2014-15
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.