IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tyler Romasco Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1987-02-15 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2005-06 Bismarck Bobcats NAHL 49 6 15 21 0.429 0.1591 0.1614 0.4538 0.4603
2006-07 — NAHL 68 12 22 34 0.500 0.1857 0.1792 0.5294 0.5109
2007-08 North Iowa Outlaws NAHL 44 6 24 30 0.682 0.2532 0.2319 0.7219 0.6612
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2011-12 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 — SR 28 2 18 20 0.714
2010-11 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 — JR 27 10 10 20 0.741
2009-10 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 — SO 27 4 8 12 0.444
2008-09 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 — FR 7 1 3 4 0.571
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.57
2008-09 · Wisconsin-Eau Claire
+216.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#18917
Forward overall
#748
Forward born in 1987
#1713
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Ricky DeRosa
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Aidan Cavallini
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Perry D'Arrisso
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.02 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

John Barone
Plymouth State · 2016-17
0.880 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Manny Gialedakis
SUNY Oswego · 2012-13
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Shayne Morrissey
Neumann · 2012-13
0.885 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.