IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Steve Beck Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1985-01-23 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2003-04 Billings Bulls NAHL 15 4 4 8 0.533 0.1959 0.1980 0.5629 0.5689
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Western New England D1 CNE SR 25 8 11 19 0.760
2018-19 Western New England D3 CNE SR 25 8 11 19 0.760
2017-18 Western New England D3 CNE JR 26 16 15 31 1.192
2016-17 Western New England D3 CNE SO 23 7 5 12 0.522
2015-16 Western New England D3 CNE FR 19 5 2 7 0.368
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.37
2015-16 · Western New England
+117.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#26203
Forward overall
#828
Forward born in 1985
#2153
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Jeff Kubiak
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Cornell (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Blake Winiecki
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Seth Adams
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Mason Jobst
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.86 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Tim Lappin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Brown (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Devon Savignac
Concordia · 2021-22
0.696 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jared Docking
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2006-07
0.739 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Stattner
Marian · 2002-03
0.741 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.