icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2003-04 | USNTDP Juniors | NAHL | 43 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 0.186 | 0.0683 | 0.0767 | 0.1963 | 0.2204 |
| 2004-05 | USNTDP Juniors | NAHL | 13 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 0.308 | 0.1130 | 0.1213 | 0.3248 | 0.3485 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | University of Alabama | ACHA_D1 | — | — | 6 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.167 |
| 2024-25 | University of Alabama | ACHA_D1 | — | — | 6 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.167 |
| 2023-24 | University of Alabama | ACHA_D1 | — | — | 6 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.167 |
| 2022-23 | University of Alabama | ACHA_D1 | — | — | 6 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.167 |
| 2021-22 | University of Alabama | ACHA_D1 | — | — | 6 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.167 |
| 2020-21 | University of Alabama | ACHA_D1 | — | — | 6 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.167 |
| 2008-09 | Michigan State | D1 | BigTen | SR | 38 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.079 |
| 2007-08 | Michigan State | D1 | BigTen | JR | 39 | 0 | 9 | 9 | 0.231 |
| 2006-07 | Michigan State | D1 | BigTen | SO | 41 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.098 |
| 2005-06 | Michigan State | D1 | BigTen | FR | 17 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.