IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jacques Lamoureux Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1986-06-14 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2003-04 Bismarck Bobcats NAHL 36 3 3 6 0.167 0.0660 0.0713 0.1750 0.1890
2004-05 Bismarck Bobcats NAHL 50 21 21 42 0.840 0.3328 0.3428 0.8819 0.9085
2005-06 Bismarck Bobcats NAHL 54 32 38 70 1.296 0.5136 0.5037 1.3610 1.3347
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2010-11 Air Force D1 AHA SR 38 24 20 44 1.158
2009-10 Air Force D1 AHA JR 37 22 20 42 1.135
2008-09 Air Force D1 AHA SO 41 33 20 53 1.293
2006-07 Northern Michigan D1 — FR 16 1 1 2 0.125
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.38
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.12
2006-07 · Northern Michigan
-66.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#11393
Forward overall
#394
Forward born in 1986
#343
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Sam Anas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.98 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (1.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.58 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Biggs
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.88 PPG
→ Miami (0.46 D1 FR PPG)
0.49 Average
NCAAe PPG
Luc Gerdes
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.58 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Robbie Payne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.12 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Heinonen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.74 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Michael Mania
UMass Dartmouth · 2018-19
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Robbie Murden
Hamilton · 2011-12
1.091 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Aidan Radic
Roger Williams · 2024-25
0.778 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.