IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Henry Meier Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2010-01-18 Country: USA Height: 5'11" (180 cm) Weight: 174 lbs (79 kg)
Minnesota
BigTen D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2026-27 Everett Silvertips WHL 5 2 0 2 0.400 0.1946 0.1946 0.9771 0.9771
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
18%
Age-Out / Club
62%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

D1 Comparables

Dylan Pavelek
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Michigan State
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Jared Fiegl
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.30 PPG
→ Cornell (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Joe Snively
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Yale (0.88 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Alec Marsh
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Penn State (0.57 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Michael Booth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Boston College (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Minnesota Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Jimmy Snuggerud
USHS-MN 2019-20
1.25
actual FR PPG at Minnesota
Jacob Kvasnicka
USHS-MN 2022-23
0.00
actual FR PPG at Minnesota
Sam Rice
USHS-MN 2020-21
0.00
actual FR PPG at Minnesota
Kade Nielsen
USHS-MN 2019-20
0.00
actual FR PPG at Minnesota

D2/3 Comparables

Austin Dollimer
Augsburg · 2014-15
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Chris Cannizzaro
Hobart · 2004-05
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Garrett Hallford
Trine · 2013-14
0.960 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.