IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Darryl Smoleroff Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1982-01-19 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2000-01 Chicago Steel USHL 52 1 8 9 0.173 0.1021 0.1034 0.5100 0.5163
2001-02 Chicago Steel USHL 61 7 15 22 0.361 0.2128 0.2049 1.0627 1.0231
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2005-06 St. John's D3 — SR 26 7 16 23 0.885
2004-05 St. John's D3 — JR 28 7 13 20 0.714
2003-04 St. John's D3 — SO 26 12 20 32 1.231
2002-03 St. John's D3 — FR 27 9 15 24 0.889
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.89
2002-03 · St. John's
+473.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#8446
Defenseman overall
#825
Defenseman born in 1982
#3006
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Taki Pantziris
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG
Matt Van Voorhis
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Denver (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Max Everson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Harvard (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Taylor Fleming
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Joseph Fiala
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Michael Guzzo
Curry · 2006-07
0.852 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Connor Sleeth
SUNY Oswego · 2018-19
0.880 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Travis Broughman
SUNY Oswego · 2016-17
0.852 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.