IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Peter Stoykewych Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1992-07-14 Country: Canada
2010 · Round 7, Pick #199  ·  Atlanta Thrashers
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2008-09 Winnipeg Blues MJHL 53 4 12 16 0.302 0.0581 0.0660 0.1904 0.2163
2009-10 Winnipeg Blues MJHL 56 6 25 31 0.554 0.1066 0.1163 0.3491 0.3809
2010-11 Des Moines Buccaneers USHL 58 5 10 15 0.259 0.1525 0.1536 0.7767 0.7824
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 Colorado College D1 NCHC — 34 3 8 11 0.324
2013-14 Colorado College D1 NCHC — 37 1 8 9 0.243
2012-13 Colorado College D1 WCHA-orig — 42 2 9 11 0.262
2011-12 Colorado College D1 WCHA-orig — 26 0 3 3 0.115
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.12
2011-12 · Colorado College
-11.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#12016
Defenseman overall
#1474
Defenseman born in 1992

D1 Comparables

Cutler Martin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Michigan (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Doyle Somerby
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Boston University (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Jimmy Mazza
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Canisius (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Jake Bischoff
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Chris Leibinger
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Colby Daniels
Westfield State · 2012-13
0.815 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Kevin Shand
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2013-14
0.412 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Raphael Robitaille
Norwich · 2003-04
1.240 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.