| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-11 | Sioux City Musketeers | USHL | 33 | 2 | 8 | 10 | 0.303 | 0.1787 | 0.1660 | 0.9100 | 0.8451 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012-13 | Providence | D1 | HockeyEast | SR | 38 | 0 | 6 | 6 | 0.158 |
| 2011-12 | Providence | D1 | HockeyEast | JR | 32 | 0 | 7 | 7 | 0.219 |
| 2010-11 | Providence | D1 | HockeyEast | SO | 9 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0.222 |
| 2009-10 | Providence | D1 | HockeyEast | FR | 34 | 1 | 11 | 12 | 0.353 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.