IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Sam Hanson

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: ?
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Rochester John Marshall USHS-MN 26 8 4 12 0.462 0.0569 0.0569 0.1121 0.1121
2020-21 Rochester John Marshall USHS-MN 14 7 4 11 0.786 0.0968 0.0968 0.1908 0.1908
2021-22 River Lakes USHS-MN 23 4 1 5 0.217 0.0268 0.0268 0.0528 0.0528
2022-23 River Lakes USHS-MN 24 0 1 1 0.042 0.0051 0.0051 0.0101 0.0101
2023-24 River Lakes USHS-MN 26 6 4 10 0.385 0.0474 0.0474 0.0934 0.0934
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Saint Mary's (MN) D1 MIAC SO 11 5 5 10 0.909
2020-21 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC SO 11 5 5 10 0.909
2019-20 Saint Mary's (MN) D1 MIAC FR 24 4 3 7 0.292
2019-20 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC FR 24 4 3 7 0.292

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
62%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#54714
Forward overall
#5257
in USHS-MN

D1 Comparables

Ryan Fitzgerald
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.12 PPG
→ Boston College (0.72 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Cédric Lacroix
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.13 PPG
→ Maine (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ian Mansfield
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Army (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bo Pieper
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.19 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bryan Basilico
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.07 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Michael Stenberg
Connecticut College · 2022-23
0.191 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
George Hansen
Gustavus Adolphus · 2015-16
0.100 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Bryan Hodges
Southern Maine · 2012-13
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.