IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Chris Waterstreet Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1992-04-18 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Traverse City North Stars NAHL 30 4 6 10 0.333 0.1225 0.1266 — —
2011-12 Traverse City North Stars NAHL 60 7 17 24 0.400 0.1470 0.1447 0.4222 0.4157
2012-13 Soo Eagles NAHL 58 15 9 24 0.414 0.1520 0.1420 0.4368 0.4081
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC SR 24 6 5 11 0.458
2015-16 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC JR 25 4 3 7 0.280
2014-15 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC SO 26 4 6 10 0.385
2013-14 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC FR 27 5 4 9 0.333
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.33
2013-14 · SUNY Oswego
+172.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#35485
Forward overall
#1343
Forward born in 1992
#3554
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Dillon Steh
Becker · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Tucker Tone
Rivier · 2024-25
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Kyle Kussmann
SUNY Brockport · 2024-25
0.739 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.