← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dominick Sacco Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-06-08 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Omaha Lancers USHL 24 4 6 10 0.417 0.2458 0.2718 1.2475 1.3793
2012-13 Omaha Lancers USHL 6 0 0 0 0.000
2013-14 Lincoln Stars USHL 52 12 13 25 0.481 0.2836 0.2852 1.4394 1.4476
2014-15 Lincoln Stars USHL 60 12 15 27 0.450 0.2655 0.2540 1.3472 1.2886
2015-16 Muskegon Lumberjacks USHL 19 1 0 1 0.053 0.0310 0.0282 0.1575 0.1433
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 St. Norbert D1 NCHA SR 25 6 18 24 0.960
2019-20 St. Norbert D3 NCHA SR 25 6 18 24 0.960
2018-19 St. Norbert D1 NCHA JR 30 12 18 30 1.000
2018-19 St. Norbert D3 NCHA JR 30 12 18 30 1.000
2017-18 St. Norbert D3 NCHA SO 31 12 16 28 0.903
2016-17 St. Norbert D3 NCHA FR 26 7 8 15 0.577
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.58
2016-17 · St. Norbert
+468.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#33312
Forward overall
#1354
Forward born in 1995
#3069
in USHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Cortland · 2008-09
0.273 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Trine · 2021-22
0.542 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Fitchburg State · 2013-14
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.