← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dave Williams Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1988-06-09 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 Seguin Bruins OJHL 40 7 7 14 0.350 0.0978 0.0986 0.2415 0.2434
2007-08 Seguin Bruins OJHL 35 12 13 25 0.714 0.1996 0.1922 0.4929 0.4746
2008-09 Port Hope Predators OJHL 46 11 13 24 0.522 0.1458 0.1329 0.3600 0.3282
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 St. Scholastica D3 SR 27 7 18 25 0.926
2013-14 St. Scholastica D3 JR 28 10 13 23 0.821
2012-13 St. Scholastica D3 SO 19 7 5 12 0.632
2011-12 St. Scholastica D3 FR 27 5 2 7 0.259
2010-11 SUNY Cortland D3 SO 1 0 0 0 0.000
2009-10 SUNY Cortland D3 FR 11 0 3 3 0.273
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.27
2009-10 · SUNY Cortland
+103.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#27326
Forward overall
#1104
Forward born in 1988
#2361
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Finlandia · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Curry · 2004-05
0.682 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Bethel · 2004-05
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.