IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Anthony Blumer Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1982-04-13 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2000-01 — USHL 32 1 4 5 0.156 0.0960 0.0983 0.4602 0.4712
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2004-05 St. Thomas D3 — SR 31 13 23 36 1.161
2003-04 St. Thomas D3 — JR 28 14 21 35 1.250
2002-03 St. Thomas D3 — SO 26 11 14 25 0.962
2001-02 St. Thomas D3 — FR 28 7 10 17 0.607
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.61
2001-02 · St. Thomas
+621.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#47525
Forward overall
#1082
Forward born in 1982
#3901
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Ryan McMurphy
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Bentley (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ben Storm
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Brad Hawkinson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Denver
0.19 No data
NCAAe PPG
David Parrottino
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Canisius
0.09 No data
NCAAe PPG
Jason Ford
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jordan Carvalho
SUNY Morrisville · 2010-11
0.833 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
David Novotny
New England College · 2018-19
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Ian Driscoll
Babson · 2019-20
0.593 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.