← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tyler Murray Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-02-11 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Muskegon Lumberjacks USHL 8 1 1 2 0.250 0.1475 0.1460 0.7509 0.7432
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 Suffolk D3 CNE JR 10 0 0 0 0.000
2013-14 Suffolk D3 CNE SO 21 3 1 4 0.191
2012-13 Suffolk D3 CNE FR 18 3 8 11 0.611
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.61
2012-13 · Suffolk
+388.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Brown (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Cornell (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Canisius
0.08 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Saint John's · 2003-04
0.760 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Lake Forest · 2002-03
1.429 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Rivier · 2023-24
0.952 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.