IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jared Dedenbach Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-12-03 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Fargo Force USHL 46 7 5 12 0.261 0.1539 0.1580 0.7811 0.8021
2013-14 — NAHL 52 8 10 18 0.346 0.1230 0.1249 0.3652 0.3708
2014-15 Jersey Hitmen USPHL-Premier-Classic 31 10 7 17 0.548 0.1539 0.1513 0.4510 0.4433
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Wisconsin-Superior D3 BigTen SO 26 5 3 8 0.308
2015-16 Wisconsin-Superior D3 BigTen FR 12 0 1 1 0.083
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.08
2015-16 · Wisconsin-Superior
-30.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#36745
Forward overall
#1446
Forward born in 1994

D1 Comparables

Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Connor Roach
SUNY Brockport · 2022-23
0.421 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Ian Zaleski
Becker · 2018-19
0.476 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Kyle Stroh
St. Norbert · 2008-09
0.481 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.