← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jake Cass Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1996-02-02 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Indiana Ice USHL 25 0 5 5 0.200 0.1180 0.1280 0.5892 0.6394
2013-14 USHL 40 1 5 6 0.150 0.0885 0.0919 0.4419 0.4589
2014-15 South Shore Kings USPHL-Premier-Classic 43 4 16 20 0.465 0.1306 0.1360 0.3831 0.3989
2015-16 South Shore Kings USPHL-Premier-Classic 21 0 9 9 0.429 0.1203 0.1194 0.3530 0.3502
2016-17 Minnesota Magicians NAHL 43 4 14 18 0.419 0.1487 0.1372 0.4395 0.4055
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Hamline D1 JR 14 1 7 8 0.571
2019-20 Hamline D3 MIAC JR 14 1 7 8 0.571
2018-19 Hamline D1 SO 25 0 4 4 0.160
2018-19 Hamline D3 MIAC SO 25 0 4 4 0.160
2017-18 Hamline D3 MIAC FR 14 0 4 4 0.286
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.29
2017-18 · Hamline
+132.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#11295
Defenseman overall
#1644
Defenseman born in 1996

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Hobart · 2016-17
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Lake Forest · 2021-22
0.720 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Plymouth State · 2016-17
0.458 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.