IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Charlie Pelnik Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1995-05-15 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Fargo Force USHL 24 0 1 1 0.042 0.0246 0.0258 0.1229 0.1289
2013-14 Langley Rivermen BCHL 53 1 9 10 0.189 0.0727 0.0747 0.2750 0.2824
2014-15 — BCHL 52 2 9 11 0.211 0.0815 0.0799 0.3082 0.3022
2015-16 Jersey Hitmen USPHL-Premier-Classic 26 0 4 4 0.154 0.0432 0.0413 0.1267 0.1211
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Oswego D1 — SR 7 0 1 1 0.143
2019-20 SUNY Oswego D3 — SR 7 0 1 1 0.143
2018-19 Oswego D1 — JR 13 0 1 1 0.077
2018-19 SUNY Oswego D3 — JR 13 0 1 1 0.077
2017-18 SUNY Oswego D3 — SO 22 1 1 2 0.091
2016-17 SUNY Oswego D3 — FR 6 0 1 1 0.167
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.05
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.17
2016-17 · SUNY Oswego
+211.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#23928
Defenseman overall
#2495
Defenseman born in 1995

D1 Comparables

Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mike Schumacher
Hamline · 2007-08
0.200 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Kyle Leahy
Wisconsin-Superior · 2008-09
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Bryce Mitzel
Finlandia · 2014-15
0.143 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.