← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kyle Leahy Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1988-05-09 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2005-06 Prince George Spruce Kings BCHL 57 4 5 9 0.158 0.0608 0.0654 0.2296 0.2470
2006-07 — BCHL 44 3 7 10 0.227 0.0876 0.0895 0.3306 0.3379
2007-08 Powell River Kings BCHL 56 3 12 15 0.268 0.1032 0.0999 0.3896 0.3772
2008-09 Powell River Kings BCHL 58 10 11 21 0.362 0.1395 0.1292 0.5266 0.4878
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 Wisconsin-Superior D3 WIAC SR 27 3 10 13 0.481
2011-12 Wisconsin-Superior D3 WIAC JR 25 6 12 18 0.720
2010-11 Wisconsin-Superior D3 WIAC SO 27 6 5 11 0.407
2009-10 Wisconsin-Superior D3 WIAC FR 24 1 7 8 0.333
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.33
2009-10 · Wisconsin-Superior
+231.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#44750
Forward overall
#1471
Forward born in 1988
#2613
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Adrian · 2024-25
0.583 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Neumann · 2004-05
0.684 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Superior · 2006-07
0.815 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.