IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Wilson Vershay Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1995-06-10 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Waterloo Black Hawks USHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2013-14 Buffalo Jr. Sabres OJHL 25 3 2 5 0.200 0.0559 0.0569 — —
2014-15 Buffalo Jr. Sabres OJHL 39 3 10 13 0.333 0.0931 0.0899 0.2300 0.2221
2015-16 Buffalo Jr. Sabres OJHL 50 4 14 18 0.360 0.1006 0.0916 0.2484 0.2262
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 SUNY Cortland D3 — FR 14 2 4 6 0.429
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.43
2016-17 · SUNY Cortland
+399.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#14048
Defenseman overall
#1771
Defenseman born in 1995

D1 Comparables

Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Casey Nelson
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Houston Wilson
Stevenson · 2016-17
0.261 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Joe Christiano
SUNY Cortland · 2007-08
0.348 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Jeremy Mitchell
St. Norbert · 2001-02
0.267 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.