IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Houston Wilson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-06-20 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Northeast Generals NAHL 11 1 1 2 0.182 0.0675 0.0636 0.1925 0.1813
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Stevenson D3 MAC SR 16 0 5 5 0.312
2019-20 Stevenson D3 MAC JR 28 8 10 18 0.643
2018-19 Stevenson D3 MAC SO 24 3 7 10 0.417
2017-18 Stevenson D3 MAC FR 23 1 5 6 0.261
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.05
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.26
2017-18 · Stevenson
+379.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#34392
Forward overall
#1537
Forward born in 1996
#4284
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Bob Kinne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ian Miller
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Nick DeCenzo
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Army (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ethan Hendrickson
Saint Michael's · 2016-17
0.273 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Pierre Ouellette
SUNY Oswego · 2014-15
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Brendan Aird
St. Norbert · 2018-19
0.429 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.