IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Houston Wilson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-06-20 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Northeast Generals NAHL 11 1 1 2 0.182 0.0668 0.0629 0.1919 0.1807
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Stevenson D1 MAC SR 16 0 5 5 0.312
2020-21 Stevenson D3 MAC SR 16 0 5 5 0.312
2019-20 Stevenson D1 MAC JR 28 8 10 18 0.643
2019-20 Stevenson D3 MAC JR 28 8 10 18 0.643
2018-19 Stevenson D1 MAC SO 24 3 7 10 0.417
2018-19 Stevenson D3 MAC SO 24 3 7 10 0.417
2017-18 Stevenson D3 MAC FR 23 1 5 6 0.261
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.05
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.26
2017-18 · Stevenson
+384.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#33804
Forward overall
#1438
Forward born in 1996
#3295
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ethan Hendrickson
St. Michael's College · 2016-17
0.273 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Daylan Marchi
Marian · 2018-19
0.200 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Sam Fuss
St. Scholastica · 2017-18
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.