IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Zachary Vickerman Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-06-22 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Elliot Lake Vikings NOJHL 53 17 16 33 0.623 0.1040 0.1067 0.2592 0.2659
2023-24 Toronto Patriots OJHL 47 8 8 16 0.340 0.0834 0.0810 0.2344 0.2277
2024-25 Markham Royals OJHL 16 1 3 4 0.250 0.0613 0.0564 0.1721 0.1584
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Southern New Hampshire D2 NE10 — 23 7 10 17 0.739
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.06
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.74
2025-26 · Southern New Hampshire
+1203.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D1
22%
NCAA D2/D3
55%
Age-Out / Club
8%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#46823
Forward overall
#3169
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Reid Brown
Gustavus Adolphus · 2015-16
0.222 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Owen Young
Salem State · 2025-26
0.133 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Brad Holman
SUNY Morrisville · 2013-14
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.