IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ethan Hendrickson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-06-27 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Boston Jr. Bruins USPHL-Elite 38 17 8 25 0.658 0.0789 0.0785 0.1511 0.1503
2016-17 New Jersey Rockets EHL 48 13 19 32 0.667 0.1431 0.1377 0.3265 0.3143
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Saint Michael's D2 — JR 27 5 6 11 0.407
2018-19 Saint Michael's D2 — SO 27 3 5 8 0.296
2017-18 Saint Michael's D2 — FR 22 2 4 6 0.273
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.27
2017-18 · Saint Michael's
+179.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#34282
Forward overall
#1527
Forward born in 1996

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Bob Kinne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cody Marooney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jayson Angus
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brendan Mark
St. Norbert · 2018-19
0.360 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Thomas Erlacher
Wisconsin-Superior · 2008-09
0.591 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Tony DuFour
SUNY Oswego · 2001-02
0.606 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.