IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Austin Swingle Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-07-29 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Indiana Ice USHL 9 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2013-14 Aberdeen Wings NAHL 48 6 3 9 0.188 0.0689 0.0722 0.1979 0.2074
2014-15 — NAHL 57 6 6 12 0.210 0.0773 0.0770 0.2222 0.2212
2015-16 Philadelphia Rebels NAHL 48 4 10 14 0.292 0.1072 0.1020 0.3079 0.2929
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Stevenson D1 MAC JR 25 6 2 8 0.320
2018-19 Stevenson D3 MAC JR 25 6 2 8 0.320
2017-18 Stevenson D3 MAC SO 18 2 2 4 0.222
2016-17 Stevenson D3 MAC FR 22 4 7 11 0.500
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.50
2016-17 · Stevenson
+514.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#47424
Forward overall
#2056
Forward born in 1995

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Shane LaVelle
Bethel · 2021-22
0.429 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Oliver Arnberg
Nichols · 2016-17
0.304 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Jimmy Mettler
UMass Dartmouth · 2021-22
0.368 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.