← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jakob Forsbacka Karlsson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-10-31 Country: Sweden
2015 · Round 2, Pick #45  ·  Boston Bruins Boston Bruins
Signed Professionally
SHL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Linköping HC U20 SHL-J20 31 9 7 16 0.516 0.2868 0.3227 0.6877 0.7737
2013-14 Omaha Lancers USHL 60 11 22 33 0.550 0.3244 0.3489 1.6519 1.7769
2014-15 Omaha Lancers USHL 50 15 38 53 1.060 0.6253 0.6419 3.1836 3.2680
2019-20 Växjö Lakers HC SHL 40 5 8 13 0.325 0.8125 0.8125 4.2408 4.2408
2020-21 SHL 50 5 8 13 0.260 0.6500 0.6500 3.3926 3.3926
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Boston University D1 HockeyEast 39 14 19 33 0.846
2015-16 Boston University D1 HockeyEast 39 10 20 30 0.769
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.49
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.77
2015-16 · Boston University
+57.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#3029
Forward overall
#165
Forward born in 1996

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 1.09 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.55 D1 FR PPG)
0.66 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.22 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.92 D1 FR PPG)
0.73 Elite
NCAAe PPG
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.88 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.43 D1 FR PPG)
0.63 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.61 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ Boston College (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.68 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Neumann · 2003-04
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.