| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012-13 | Linköping HC U20 | SHL-J20 | 31 | 9 | 7 | 16 | 0.516 | 0.2868 | 0.3227 | 0.6877 | 0.7737 |
| 2013-14 | Omaha Lancers | USHL | 60 | 11 | 22 | 33 | 0.550 | 0.3244 | 0.3489 | 1.6519 | 1.7769 |
| 2014-15 | Omaha Lancers | USHL | 50 | 15 | 38 | 53 | 1.060 | 0.6253 | 0.6419 | 3.1836 | 3.2680 |
| 2019-20 | Växjö Lakers HC | SHL | 40 | 5 | 8 | 13 | 0.325 | 0.8125 | 0.8125 | 4.2408 | 4.2408 |
| 2020-21 | — | SHL | 50 | 5 | 8 | 13 | 0.260 | 0.6500 | 0.6500 | 3.3926 | 3.3926 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-17 | Boston University | D1 | HockeyEast | — | 39 | 14 | 19 | 33 | 0.846 |
| 2015-16 | Boston University | D1 | HockeyEast | — | 39 | 10 | 20 | 30 | 0.769 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.