IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Marcel Godbout Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-06-04 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Des Moines Buccaneers USHL 54 14 11 25 0.463 0.2731 0.2882 1.3906 1.4674
2014-15 — USHL 58 11 11 22 0.379 0.2237 0.2251 1.1392 1.1462
2015-16 — USHL 62 22 12 34 0.548 0.3235 0.3104 1.6471 1.5806
2016-17 — USHL 33 9 6 15 0.455 0.2681 0.2436 1.3650 1.2402
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Sacred Heart D1 AHA SR 18 5 6 11 0.611
2019-20 Sacred Heart D1 AHA JR 5 2 0 2 0.400
2018-19 Sacred Heart D1 AHA SO 31 4 3 7 0.226
2017-18 Sacred Heart D1 AHA — 0 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#17287
Forward overall
#669
Forward born in 1996
#1678
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
T.J. Sarcona
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Chris Berry
Wisconsin-Superior · 2005-06
1.111 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Tim Santopaolo
Aurora · 2013-14
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Brett Ouderkirk
Norwich · 2017-18
0.966 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.